There is a strong perception that Nepal’s international relations and diplomatic efforts werewas considerably robust in the past. However, this strength has diminished since the democratic transition. There exists a narrative about glorious past illustrious diplomatic history largely shaped by its monarchs. But since the transition to democracy and furthered by subsequent shift to a republic state led by the democratic leadership- Nepal’s diplomatic efforts show signs of weakening. This raises the questionTaking this into account: has the national leadership truly faltered in foreign relations or has the changing international context shifted the global positioning of Nepal. perspective did the leadership play the role or international context determined global positioning of Nepal. So, what matters the most leadership or context that defines the strength and weakness of diplomatic effort.